Lennin, Karl Marx and Hannah Ardent on Revolution, what was revolution Research Paper

Lennin, Karl Marx and Hannah Ardent on Revolution, what was conversion - Research Paper ExampleFor a Marxist, if the bourgeoisie rest in power this negates any procedural facade of a revolution. For a liberal democrat, the survival of factions from the centenarian nomenclature deflates the democratic revolution. However, on closer inspection there is not a single sit of characteristics that will serve to unite all around a common conception. This thesis tends to enquire Marx, Lenin and Arendts views on revolution in order to seek a plausible conclusion. Karl Marx described revolutions as the locomotives of history. He argued that feudalism, capitalism and socialism, as new modes of production, were generated within the precincts of the existing one. Revolutions were caused by the development of a contradiction betwixt the social forces and the social relations of production, with the latter acting as restrains upon the former. This expressed itself in the escalation of class con flict, focal point in what Marx called the epoch of social revolution. Each revolutionary class developed awareness of itself through stinting and political struggles against the existing dominant class. The result would be the emergence of new relations of production and their incidental ideological forms, and the eventual establishment ofsupremacy. ... In due course of time Marxist theory face real tests as its prophecy of eventual dismal condition of working class before revolution was seriously challenged by better/improved life styles of working class in capitalistic states. Lenin. Vladimir Ulyanov came from a provincial middle class family of Russia. Soon after his fathers death in 1886 Lenins elder Brother horse parsley was hanged for participating in a plot by a revolutionarypopulistgroup to murder Alexander III. This event made a deep impression on the younger Lenin and, after transient his final school exams with distinction, he too joined a populist group when he beg an perusing atKazan University. He was deeply influenced by Marxism during his student life. In 1902, Lenin published hispamphletwhat is to be done, in which he argued that a successful revolutionary party in Russian conditions had to be a passing centralized and conspiratorial organization of professional revolutionaries to be an effective vanguard of the workers. In his work twain Tactics of Social Democracy in the Democratic Revolutionhe argued that the workers would have to take a leading role in thebourgeoisrevolution, co-operating with revolutionary elements in the peasantry. This latter point was unusual in Marxist thinking, perhaps showing underlying populist influence on Lenin. InImperialism, he argued that the capitalist powers were driven into territorial imperialism by capital export and used the super-profits derived from colonial exploitation. Lazarus points out that Revolution belongs as a category to the historicism that is fuelled by defunct socialism and parliame ntarianism, because, historicism keeps a place